Er,ODM-I have a question for you-and it IS just a question,not an observation or,God forbid an implied criticism.
OK,now forgive me if Ive got this wrong-Ive not had time to read this too carefully-but am I right in understanding that a significant part of your strategy is to back Prem draws and lay after 75 mins?
My question is this,whats the main purpose of the thread-is it to show that your numbers are good/profitable?(And thus people should do these bets)?
If thats not the main purpose please ignore this.
If so,then,it seems to me that a possible problem may be that IF backing the draws in certain Premiership games(lets say ones where the favourite is Evens or bigger) then laying late in the 2nd half is,IN ITSELF,a profitable strategy(and I like to bet on the 1-1 and bet against that position later on and tell all my friends to at least try it) then wouldnt this "profitable"? strategy make it harder to correctly assess your actual figures' performance?
Now,as it happens,it appears that youd have made MORE profit so far if you hadnt been laying.
But,then again,the fact that laying is part of your strategy means that you are able to bet larger amounts per bet than you would if you were relying SOLELY on your figures?
Anyway,I hope you can see what Im trying to get at?Im interested in this because Im fascinated by peoples use of stats to try to win at football betting especially on the Premiership(since its commonly believed among many pro gamblers,I believe,that the Prem prices are rarely wrong).
If you have formulated figures that prove such people wrong I most certainly would want to be the first to know-hence my curiosity/interest.